Removal/Deportation

I have been Detained in an Immigration Detention Facility, Am I Eligible for Bond?

Published on: July 4, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

If the immigration officers decide to detain someone, they first determine if the person is eligible for an immigration bond, and if so, they will decide how much the bond will be. An immigration bond can range anywhere from $1500 to $25000 or more. If an immigration officer determines that you are not eligible for a bond, then you will be held in immigration detention until your immigration case is over, or an immigration judge gives you a bond.

Sometimes immigration officers will decide you are not eligible for a bond because you are subject to mandatory detention under Section 236(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). If you are subject to mandatory detention during your immigration hearings, even the immigration judge has no authority under the law to release you from custody. If immigration officers determine that you are an arriving alien, that is, immigration officers stopped you at a land/sea/air port or border and detained you there or during deferred inspection, then you are not eligible for a bond and an even an immigration judge cannot give you one. If you already have a final order of removal/deportation (an order that is not on appeal with the Board of Immigration Appeals) then you are also not eligible for a bond and an immigration judge cannot give you one. There are a few other categories of people who are not eligible for bond, but those three categories cover the vast majority of people who are not eligible for an immigration bond.

How will you know if you are subject to mandatory detention under INA § 236(c)? You must look at your Form I-862, Notice to Appear (NTA) to determine if you are subject to mandatory detention under this section. If you are being detained and placed in removal/deportation proceedings, you should be served with an NTA within a few days of being detained. If you are charged with any criminal ground of removability under INA § 212(a)(2) (which include controlled substance offenses, crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMT), and controlled substance trafficking offenses) then you are not eligible for a bond. If you are charged under one of the criminal grounds of removability under INA § 237(a)(2), then you may also be subject to mandatory detention. These grounds of removability include any aggravated felony, any firearms offense, any controlled substance offense and any offenses involving two CIMTs. There are only two grounds of criminal removability under INA § 237(a)(2) that do not make you subject to mandatory detention. One of those sections is INA § 237(a)(2)(E), which involves crimes of domestic violence, child abuse, stalking, child neglect and violations of protective orders. The second is a conviction for one CIMT within five years of admission for which you were not sentenced to more than a year in prison.

Why the President’s Pledge to Send More Resources to the Southwest Border is Good for the Migrant Children and Families Coming to the U.S.

Published on: July 2, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

Last Monday, President Obama announced that he was sending additional resources to the Southwest Border to help with the growing humanitarian crisis involving tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors and families migrating from Central American. The President vowed these resources in part, to more quickly return “unlawful migrants” to their home countries and discourage additional children and families from following in their same dangerous path to the U.S.

The President said regarding these expanded resources: the Department of Justice (DOJ) and DHS [Department of Homeland Security] are deploying additional enforcement resources — including immigration judges, Immigration and Customs Enforcement attorneys, and asylum officers — to focus on individuals and adults traveling with children from Central America and entering without authorization across the Southwest border. The DHS is working to secure additional space that satisfies applicable legal and humanitarian standards for detention of adults with children. This surge of resources will mean that cases are processed fairly and as quickly as possible, ensuring the protection of asylum seekers and refugees while enabling the prompt removal of individuals who do not qualify for asylum or other forms of relief from removal.

Many pro-immigration advocates have criticized the President’s decision. They argue that returning migrant children and families to their home countries is inhumane and in many cases we would be sending these migrants back to the crime and poverty that are the very reasons they fled to the U.S. However, this promise of expanded resources will actually help ensure that those migrants, many of whom are eligible for immigration benefits in this country, will receive a full and fair determination of their eligibility, rather than face lengthy detention and summary denials of benefits.

My loved one has been detained by immigration officers, what can an attorney do for us?

Published on: June 30, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

When U.S. immigration officers arrest someone, the hours, days and weeks that follow can be some of the most confusing, frightening but important times of their lives. The decisions that someone makes during this time can possibly mean the difference between staying in the U.S. with your loved ones or being deported and possibly never seeing them again.

When immigration officers encounter someone who they believe is in the U.S. in violation of the immigration laws, one of the first decisions they make is whether or not to detain the person in an immigration detention facility. If immigration officers decide not to detain the person, then this fortunate non-citizen is given an order of recognizance, or an Oreck (O-Reck) as the officers call it. When someone is on an ORec, they have to report periodically to immigration officers while their case is pending in immigration court.

If the immigration officers decide to detain someone, they first determine if the person is eligible for an immigration bond, and if so, they will decide how much the bond will be. An immigration bond can range anywhere from $1500 to $25,000 or more. If an immigration officer determines that you are not eligible for a bond, then you will be held in immigration detention until your cases is over, an immigration officer decides to release you or an immigration judge gives you a bond.

Expedited Removal, What is it and What can I do if the Government uses it Against Me?

Published on: June 27, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

Expedited Removal is a way that officers from the Department of Homeland Security, (DHS) primarily U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) can order someone removed from the United States without taking them before and Immigration Judge. This is one of many “alternatives to removal proceedings” that the government can use to obtain an order of removal against a non-citizen while keeping them from seeing an immigration judge.

DHS defines Expedited \Removal as, “The statutory authority to order certain aliens removed from the United States without further hearing or interview, unless the alien indicates an intention to apply for asylum, or expresses a fear of persecution or torture if returned to his or her country.” The authority comes from Section 235(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. The Government and DHS justify the use of this form of removal by arguing that the need to secure the border and curb human smuggling outweighs the limited due process afforded those subject to expedited removal.

DHS is allowed to apply expedited removal to two general types of people. 1) Arriving Aliens: If a person seeks admission to the U.S. at a land, sea or air border/port, and they are not a U.S. citizen and do not have a green card, they are generally arriving aliens. 2) Any non-citizen who does not have a green card who has entered the U.S. without admission or parole (illegally) and is caught within 100 miles of an international border and within 14 days of their entry.

The Orlando Immigration Court handles cases for people detained at the Baker County Jail

Published on: June 23, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

The Orlando Immigration Court handles immigration cases for almost every non-citizen who lives in 57 of Florida’s 67 counties. Every person in removal proceedings who lives north of Charlotte County on the west coast of Florida and Martin County on the east coast, will likely have their immigration hearing in the Orlando Court. The Orlando Immigration Court is located at 3535 Lawton Road, Suite 200, Orlando, Florida. The Court is just north and east of downtown Orlando, near the Fashion Square Mall.

The Orlando Immigration Court currently has six Immigration Judges who each handle non-detained removal cases. Judge Rafael Ortiz-Segura is the senior judge, and there are five other judges in Orlando. They are, Victoria Ghartey, Daniel Lippman, Kevin Chapman, James Grim and Stuart Karden. Only one Immigration Judge currently handles detained immigration cases, that is, senior judge, Ortiz-Segura.

The Orlando Immigration Court handles primarily non-detained immigration cases, however, the Court handles detained immigration cases for people detained at the Baker County Jail, in MacClenny, Florida. The Baker County Jail is located about 30 minutes west of Jacksonville, Florida. The Baker county jail holds only non-citizens who have been arrested for, or convicted of crimes. The Orlando Immigration Court holds televideo hearings with detainees from the Baker County Jail appearing on a television screen in the courtroom in Orlando. Detainees at the Baker County Jail can have attorneys appear at the jail with them for all but the final individual hearing on any application for relief from removal. If a detainee has an individual hearing on an application for relief, their attorney and witnesses will need to appear live at the Orlando Immigration Court.

Your Rights to Confidentiality when you Apply for Asylum and other forms of Protection.

Published on: June 20, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

The confidentiality of an asylum claim is a common concern for people in the United States who have filed an I-589 Application for Asylum. One person asked me if local law enforcement officers, who were interviewing him about a crime, would know that he applied for asylum and then use that information against him. Other asylum-seekers are worried that the government in their home countries, who is often the entity the person fears, will find out that they applied for asylum and harm them or their families.

The U.S. laws about to whom DHS (which includes USCIS, ICE, and CBP) can disclose that you have filed an asylum application is very strict. In addition, the consequences against a government official who illegally disclosed confidential asylum information are serious.

8 C.F.R. § 208.6 and 1208.6 regulate asylum-related confidentiality issues. These regulations forbid the disclosure by the U.S. government to a third party of any information or documents related to a number of different forms of immigration relief or “protection.” These include asylum claims and credible or reasonable fear reviews. By law and policy, the DHS has expanded this protection to include any application for asylum, withholding of removal (INA § 241), protection under Article III of the Convention Against Torture, refugee status (INA § 209), and any claim of fear that is referred to USCIS for a credible fear or reasonable fear review.

My Spouse, Parent, Child, or Employee was arrested by ICE; What do I do now?

Published on: June 18, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

This is a common question for tens of thousands of people every year in the United States whose loved ones or employees are arrested by immigration officers. The question can come up in many different contexts: “my son was arrested for grand theft, but now he is detained by Immigration,” or “my dad was pulled over for not having a license, now Immigration has him,” or “my husband went to his immigration interview and ICE arrested him,” or “my employee was coming back from a short trip out of the country and they arrested him at the port.”

In Florida, if your loved one was arrested by Immigration Officers, they can be detained in one of multiple ICE detention facilities across the state. If ICE detainees the person in Central or North Florida, they will likely be detained in the Wakulla County Jail just south of Tallahassee or the Baker County Jail just west of Jacksonville. If your loved one was detained in South Florida, they will likely be sent to the Broward Transitional Center (BTC) just north of Ft. Lauderdale, the Kreme Service Processing Center (Krome SPC), west of Miami, or the Glades County Jail, southwest of Lake Okeechobee.

One way to find out where your loved one is detained by ICE is to check the ICE Online Detainee Locator System at https://locator.ice.gov/odls/homePage.do

ICE can remove you from the U.S. before you ever see an Immigration Judge.

Published on: June 16, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

The American Immigration Lawyer’s Association (AILA) recently posted an article on what they referred to as “No-Process Removals.” Click here to read the article.

A “no-process” removal is one where an alien receives an order of removal (deportation) not from an Immigration Judge, but rather, from an Immigration Officer who works for the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

These methods of removal can take many forms, including, but not limited to, expedited removal under INA § 235(1)(b); reinstatement of removal under INA § 241(a)(5); administrative removal under INA § 238(b); and visa waiver removal under INA § 217(b). When ICE decides to remove an alien through one of these methods, there is no neutral party (Immigration Judge) to review the evidence and determine if ICE has carried its burden to establish that the alien is removable from the United States by clear and convincing evidence. In addition, an alien’s family ties, work and educational history, ties to the community, hardship to the alien’s family if they are removed, and other positive discretionary factors are irrelevant.

Stay of Deportation or Removal: A Last Line of Defense

Published on: May 14, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

Many people believe that when an immigrant is ordered removed from the United States by an immigration judge, that they are immediately removed. The truth is that the United States doesn’t have the resources to physically remove the countless non-citizens who have been ordered removed. There is one arrow left in the quiver of many non-citizens that may enable them to stay and even obtain employment authorization for a finite period of time. It is call a Stay of Deportation or Removal.

A Stay of Deportation or Removal is humanitarian grant by the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (DHS/ICE). It is basically their agreement to hold off on effecting the removal order for a period of time, to be determined by them.

A non-citizen who has been ordered removed by an immigration judge can request a stay of removal by submitting Form I-246, Application for a Stay of Deportation or Removal to the local Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) office. The application must be supported by ample documentary evidence supporting the reasons for the request.

30 Day Deadline to Appeal Removal Orders

Published on: April 28, 2014 | by Lasnetski Gihon Law

In the event that an Immigration Judge finds a person removable from the United States and denies that person any form of relief, there is a 30 day deadline to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. This is an extremely important deadline. Many potential clients have come to my office years later asking to take their case when they have let that deadline come and go. Appeals are a natural and important part of any immigration case that is denied by an immigration judge. There may be novel or undeveloped issues of law that are ripe for review. There may be issues of fact that can be viewed in a different light by the BIA. The immigration judge may have made a legal or factual error. It is important to have an immigration lawyer review your case well within the 30 day appeal period to determine whether you may have a viable appeal.

During the course of the appeal to the BIA, the person will not be deported. If the BIA denies the appeal, the person can appeal the BIA’s decision to the federal circuit court by filing a Petition for Review. Unfortunately, there is no automatic right to stay the removal during the appeal to the circuit court and stays are rarely granted pending the appeal.

An appeal is a very important and often productive weapon in the arsenal of an immigration lawyer or any person facing removal. You can obtain more information about the Board of Immigration Appeals here at their website.